Posts tagged as:

Movie Reviews

In a previous post, I determined that The Happening edged Taking Lives as the worst movie that I had seen in the first decade of this millennium, and moving forward, I’m proud—or saddened—to announce that I have a front runner for the worst movie I will see in the next ten years.

Just to put this in perspective, I would rather let a blind woman with cold, shaky hands shave my crotch with a rusty trowel than watch this movie again.

Historically, most February movies have not been Oscar contenders, or even movies that you would want to see more than a handful of times—and most often when you did, it would be in snippets on Cinemax or HBO.  Being aware of this, I entered The Wolfman merely expecting a fun movie, perhaps even with a few moments that could make me jump, about a man who is bitten by a werewolf and subsequently bites the heads off of live chickens and has an insatiable urge to hump everything during a full moon.  Unfortunately, the word I chose to focus on was fun—which The Wolfman most certainly is not.

It’s also not entertaining, cohesive, or suspenseful.

Granted, werewolves aren’t the most complex of mythic creatures to grace the screen.  The affliction comes from the bite of another werewolf and the transformation takes place for a few hours once a month, usually leaving the afflicted person unable to remember the violence he committed.  Thus, some semi-plausible story needs to be woven in—see Teen Wolf’s focus on teenage angst and basketball with the occasional need to rub calamine on a bout of mange.

Unfortunately, the story within The Wolfman is poorly executed and extremely confused.  While there is an attempted homage to the 1941 original, the current version lacks tension and charisma.  Like the original, the protagonist Larry/Lawrence Talbot returns to Europe upon the death of his brother and is soon bitten by a werewolf which infects him with the transformative disease.

In the original, Larry (Lon Chaney Jr.) kills the original werewolf to protect a young woman, but he is bitten in the struggle. In newest version, Lawrence (Benicio Del Toro) is merely attacked, and the assailant escapes into the forest. This isn’t a poor variation, but it leads the audience on a path of silliness and a predictable showdown with the alpha werewolf—who happens to be Lawrence’s father John Talbot, a performance phoned in by Anthony Hopkins (I’m choosing to drop the Sir from this one).

Note: You read that correctly.  The Welsh Hopkins plays the father to the Puerto Rican Del Toro.  If these two actors weren’t Oscar winners who each had moments of stardom, this wouldn’t matter, but we know who these men are, and suspension of disbelief is difficult when knowledge is present with a gong. In the same vein, the “Welsh” Lawrence’s accent is obviated with the simple explanation that “he spent some time in the Americas.”

In addition to the CGI-werewolf showdown—which makes the CGI wolves on the battleship from The Day After Tomorrow look like the dinosaurs from Jurassic Park—we learn that John Talbot also killed his wife in a werewolfian rage, one that Lawrence was witness to, but blocked out, thus resulting in his stay at an asylum; a love story also materializes between Lawrence and Gwen Conliffe (Emily Blunt), his dead brother’s wife, who is somehow the only one that can save Lawrence, though I’m sure anyone could shoot him with a silver bullet.  Ostensibly, these are venial sins in a horror movie, but the audience learns of these things just about as quickly as you’ve read them on this screen, which suffocates any character development or logical connection between scenes.

For example, after Lawrence has been bitten and sewn up, the speculation swirls that he is infected, so he seeks guidance from his father, who subsequently locks him in a cell in their basement as the full moon appears outside.  Somehow—and I say this because John Talbot clearly bolts the door—Lawrence escapes, disembowels a few people, and wakes up at dawn covered in blood.  John Talbot stands over him and scolds him, saying “You’ve done a bad thing Lawrence. You’ve done terrible things!”  At this moment, I was nearly expecting John to pull out a rolled-up newspaper and whack Lawrence on the nose before rubbing his nose in someone’s entrails.

What seems to be soon after, though logistically it must be at least a month, Lawrence is back in an asylum and showcased to an audience on the night of a full moon.  Of course, the wispy clouds that obscure the moon drift away and Lawrence changes once again, this time killing a few skeptics and escaping into the Welsh countryside, where he somehow wanders—with repaired clothing a newly donned hat—for another month that races by at mercurial speed.

Luckily, the third act begins, and Scotland Yard Detective Abberline (Hugo Weaving), who occasionally pops on screen to show us that someone is chasing Lawrence, enters a bar with a sixth sense that “he will come.”  Well, why? Aside from a sophomore screenwriting class, how does he know this?

This is also conveniently where the aforementioned love connection materializes: as Lawrence traipses around Wales, he declares that Gwen is the “only one that can help him.” Again, why? Luckily, as darkness descends, Gwen shows up on a white horse—I shit you not, a white horse.

From this point on, the smell of kielbasa wafted into the theater, so my memory is a bit foggy, but Gwen “sets him free” by shooting him through the heart.  What might be most spectacularly and viciously ridiculous about The Wolfman is that it ends with what might be the most elementary-school-like depiction of death to appear on celluloid since film became an art.  Harsh? Probably, but deserving.  Del Toro falls into Blunt’s lap, and with his final breath—which, aside from a voice over that reaffirms the power of “true love,” is the last line of the movie— releases a “blaaaagh” as if I was actually listening to the $12.50 cents disappearing from my checking account.

DYL MAG Score: -3

{ 7 comments }

Saturday Morning Quiz:

The above poster advertises:

  1. The Vatican’s rationale for requiring abstinence
  2. An ice-skating team preparing for Vancouver
  3. Thirst, a movie about Vampires
  4. Kim Jong Il’s growing fear of rong-regged women

If you answered “1”, it’s not women the Vatican is worried about. “2”, she’s not wearing skates. “4”, you racist!

Prior to being deemed too risque in South Korea because it portrays a priest being straddled, this poster advertised Chan-wook Park’s Thirst, a film that centers on a priest’s accidental transformation into a vampire.

(Note: The original intention of this advertisement was to depict a bat-like image, not necessarily a novel take on erotic asphyxiation—though I am now intrigued by the potential of getting rabies and the advantages of purchasing a clerical collar)

Wanting to help humanity through more than just offering absolution from a confession box, Father Sang-hyeon (Kang-ho Song) offers his body to science by traveling to Africa and volunteering in experimental procedure designed to eradicate the deadly EV virus.  Inevitably, the virus ravishes Sang-hyeon’s body, resulting in a blood-purging scene that rivals the blood-spraying suicide scene in Michael Haneke’s Cache.

Given that five hundred volunteers perished prior to Sang-hyeon, the doctors perfunctorily give him a blood transfusion and pronounce him dead shortly thereafter—he has no pulse, and most of his blood resides on the austere hospital floor—but as the Father’s face is covered, he recites a prayer and becomes the sole survivor. An immediate prophet, he is flocked upon by the faithful who clamor for miracles and absolution.

Ironically, the life-saving blood has come from a vampire; thus begins the good Father’s transition away from selfless prelate. To Park’s credit, he fashions a story that could have gone off the deep end much sooner and delved into debauchery, criticizing faith as superstition.  And while this commentary can be rendered from Thirst, it is slow-played and Father Sang-hyeon’s plight is illustrated as genuine—realizing the transformation his body has undergone, Sang-hyeon resigns to die before taking another soul’s life; at the same time, he can’t let himself perish because it would contradict his inherent stance against suicide, which he earlier refers to as “a sin greater than murder” (I would have used the original Korean, but I don’t speak it—though I can say “hello” thanks to Arrested Development—and I picked up “carrot” one night in a bar).

Creatively, Sang-hyeon survives by haunting hospitals under the guise of charity work; he lives primarily from draining the blood from coma victims—though not enough to lower their vitals to the point of death or danger.  In addition, his blind father often slits a wrist to and offers a pint to Sang-hyeon, preventing the EV virus from re-emerging and ravaging his body.

So far, Sang-hyeon controls his rising desire to imbibe blood and suffocates his libido by routinely smacking his groin with a metal ruler, but this is all thrown into upheaval when Kang-woo, a perpetually sick hypochondriac, his mother Lady Ra and their servant/Kang-woo’s wife Tae-ju arrive at the hospital seeking a miracle from Father Sang-hyeon.  This marks the end of the first act, which deals primarily with the clergyman’s inner conflict; the second act imagines a taboo love story.

Played provocatively and eerily by Ok-bin Kim, Tae-ju lures Sang-hyeon into the web that superficially composes her life of depravation and abuse.  Taunted by Tae-ju’s eroticism and his priestly need to offer salvation, Sang-hyeon is trapped, and while Tae-ju’s life isn’t perfect, she practices self-mutilation to coax Sang-hyeon to perform the sole act he refuses—murder.

From here on out, the film goes a bit awry as Sang-hyeon eventually turns Tae-ju into a vampire.  Even though the events that lead to her transformation are crafted with a meticulous hand and are tensely suspenseful, the denouement of the film gravitates toward the predictable.  Her acquired immortality and desire for the inherent super-human power far outweighs Sang-hyeon’s original intention for turning her—an eternal partnership sustained by love, not carnage.

I can’t say the last act isn’t a fun ride. It’s intelligently done, though a tad glacial until the last five minutes, which might be one of the most honest and sentimental moments that Sang-hyeon and Tae-ju share throughout the film.

DYL MAG Score: 7

{ 1 comment }

The Satanic Mr. Fox

by Dustin Freeley on January 20, 2010 · 0 comments

 

I’m not one for listening intently to animals, but when one is self-disemboweling and mangy, you might as well take heed.  

Turn around Willem Defoe! Your unnamed wife is brandishing a grindstone and is about to fasten it to your leg after she bores a hole through your ankle with a screwdriver!  I guess it could be worse. At least she isn’t Tobey Maguire in his blue tights with flamishly red boots and gloves.

I’m not sure if I have the stomach to fully analyze Antichrist here, though I will say it got a bad rap.  Terribly mislabled as torture-porn–Passion of the Christ surely surpasses anything grotesque Antichrist has to offer–it debuted to a rogue wave of jeers at Cannes that digressed to snickers.  I think von Trier’s reputation precedes him a bit too much to have this film taken seriously immediately, but I think there’s quite a bit of merit to it in regard to exploring socially constructed gender roles.

Plus, Charlotte Gainsburg is superb in her role as She, the anxiety ridden mother whose son recently plummeted out a window.

Check out in-depth analysis of Antichrist here:

http://www.doyoulikemoviesaboutgladiators.com/chaos-reigns-over-gender-roles-in-antichrist/.

  And, obey the fox.

DYL MAG Score: 7

{ 0 comments }

Characteristically, Jeff Bridges captivates the audience with his portrayal of Bad Blake, a hard-drinking, serial marrying, downward-spiraling country singer who has gone from headliner to saloon-crooner.  The film’s redemption theme is not unique—it’s really kind of a rehashing of 2008’s The Wrestler — so Crazy Heart offers nothing new to the category of “man must save his life or die by the way he lives” formula; however, Bridges often overshadows the clichéd story with a performance that shies away from the oft-hyperbolic portrayals of alcoholics and drug abusers — see Leaving Las Vegas, which will be discussed in an upcoming post, titled Nic Cage: My Uncle is Francis Ford Coppola.

In a refreshing performance, Bridges plays Blake as a cognizant, functioning alcoholic, not as one who stumbles from bar to bar, starting fights and slurring consistently before breaking down in tears. There is really only one scene where alcohol visibly gets the best of Blake, but it’s only momentary, requiring him to leave the stage in a dumpy bar to vomit before continuing.

Similarly, Crazy Heart doesn’t force an uber-tragic moment of clarity on us.  While we feel for Blake, his rock-bottom transpires from coincidence and a child’s curious nature, not a drunken hallucination that results in someone’s death or injury.  Instead, Blake obviates the trust that Jean Craddick (Maggie Gyllenhaal) bestows on him, which makes Blake’s fall internal, and refreshingly, it doesn’t feel forced.

Perhaps this is because Gyllenhaal portrays Jean as strong-willed yet whimsical, aware that Blake is on the verge of tumbling off a cliff, but enamored by the talented poet underneath.  And while Gyllenhaal gives a rather underrated performance in Crazy Heart, this relationship is the major element of the film that I have a problem grasping.  The acting is genuine, but the story is weak.  She’s a journalist for a small-town newspaper, and Blake is her temporal subject.  Somehow, they fall in love, but it’s never clear why.  Yes, she loves his music, but we find that out well after they begin their affair, so what’s the impetus?  There are only so many times that movies can employ the “love is a mystery” scapegoat.

Of course we know a fall is coming, but when it does, Crazy Heart does not compile a montage that conveys the trials and tribulations of rehab — the clinical scene lasts about forty-five seconds and merely shows Blake standing up in front of a group, admitting that he’s an alcoholic.

In the end, there is no neat little bow. Often, there is one of two directions taken in redemption films: relapse, which leads to death and suggests that humans are destined to fail, or victory, which insists that humans can erase their flaws. This film really depicts neither. He doesn’t fall at the end, but he doesn’t win either. He knows temptation lies within reach, and he acknowledges his limitations while taking responsibility for letting most everything slip out of his grasp.

He’s not a hero, and he’s not a villain. He’s human.

DYL MAG Score: 7

{ 2 comments }