Posts tagged as:

Movie Review

Two years ago, I was heading from Oregon to New York.  As a week of Pinot drinking was slowly seeping its way out of my sweat glands and gradually returning my retinas to their inherently white color, the seven hour, two-part flight was a bit daunting. However, things began to look up as I arrived at PDX and was offered a seat in first class – on the first leg of my trip – for a minor sum of money. Since checking a bag is recently the equivalent of leaving luggage on a Manhattan street corner and assuming no one will steal it, damage it, or micturate on it, I rarely do it, thus leaving me thirty five dollars to apply toward the upgrade. Nice.

First class was fine, though kind of like viewing the Mona Lisa. Nothing against Di Vinci. The painting is stellar, though its reputation suggests it should be a work that makes me wonder why my life has been so insignificant and inspires me to paint something equally stellar or become a street-preaching demagogue who starts a new religion. (Gingerism! Featuring scripture by Bog’s right hand: Ron Howard, usually referred to as St. Opie.)

However, the painting is 30×20 inches, and the dame’s a little homely.

Likewise, first class is more comfortable than coach, but it’s not a temperpedic mattress with a goose down comforter.

Arriving in Cleveland, I knew I had coach to look forward to, but since it’s only about an hour and fifteen minute flight, I figured I would make do. The memory of comfortable first class seats cosseting each buttock would not fade on the concrete slab of 23A. Unfortunately, the benefit of first class is the amount of space between you and the other person, and from my single experience, I can say that the peacefulness – more than likely because there is less to complain about. 23B housed an elbow-gesticulating-woman whose introduction was “Hi I’m Mary, and I’m scared to death of flying because I’m scared to death of dying and I become very anxious on flights every bit of turbulence makes me say ‘Oh God’ what’s happening I am definitely a white knuckle flyer do you have any gum?” Luckily, her bulbous husband was there to settle her down by saying “Ha! It’s so true. Do you have any gum?”

Needless to say, the next hour and forty-five minute flight was stellar. (thirty extra minutes in a holding pattern because of inclimate weather – see a euphemism for incompetence.)

The second half of Splice re-conjured this memory, and when the credits rolled, a rogue wave of phantom pains from the Coca Cola that Mary spilled on my jeans during a fit of unwarranted nervousness tickled the hair on my upper thigh.

Beginning with a promising premise, Splice offers a look at the perils amid the genius accomplishment of genetic engineering. Interestingly, the perils are not served as purely moral or ethical amuse bouche – though they exist – instead, a number of the perils tackled are the interference of beaurocracy in a capital-driven industry where cells need to be replicated and diseases need to be cured to satiate the hungry pharmaceutical companies.

Likewise, Clive Nicoli and Elsa Kast (Adrien Brody, Sarah Polley) give fine performances and make the characters – initially interesting. Often, the stigma of a horror or suspense movie is one that fosters thin 3×5 card characters who have transparent personalities and speak in cheesy pseudo-dialog one-liners – see the most recent regurgitation of Friday the 13th.  Their dynamic as a couple is also intriguing in that Clive wants to eventually have children, and Elsa does not because “it’s not [his] body” that has to change. This is a fine infusion of a contemporary female conflict that posits the physical, capital-generating body in conflict with the physcial, child-bearing body of women. Posing an alternate hypothetical, Elsa suggests they wait until men can bear children, but Clive refuses to entertain this. The scene is shot well enough to inject humor, but underneath it suggests that Clive wants the responsibility – or labor – of child-bearing just as much as Elsa does; it’s just convenient that he doesn’t have to partake in it. This scene adequately foreshadows the creation of a multi-animal/human hybrid that Elsa takes upon herself to impregnate while Clive is locked outside of the test room, banging on the door, pleading her not to do it.

We are now travelling at an altitude of thirty five thousand seats and have turned off the seatbelt sign. Please feel free to move about the cabin.

At this moment, the desires of both characters are ultimately fulfilled inasmuch as Elsa obviates carrying and birthing the child and Clive technically gets to be a father. At the same time, the creation of the being – later named Dren – ultimately symbolizes the need to be capitally successful and world-renowned. As Elsa asserts earlier in the film, not just anyone lands “on the cover of Wired.”

Dren’s birth is initially a complication because neither Elsa nor Clive thought that it would gestate to full term. When it does, a living thing is introduced into the equation. Since it starts off looking like an armless kangaroo with a groundhog-like face, there is little concern. However, it eventually – and shortly because of rapidly multiplying and aging cells – begins to look human, which fosters an emotional, maternal attachment on the part of Elsa.

Good afternoon folks. If you will all please return to your seats, we are going to begin our decent shortly.

This emotional attachment is compounded when Elsa erases “it” from conversation and replaces it with “Dren,” which immediately categorizes the being as human. Here, the audience is still a bit uncertain what to think of Dren, and a bit uncertain what think about Elsa as well. Somewhere in the interim, Clive’s nosy brother stumbles upon this experiment, and the couple needs to find somewhere to store Dren; clearly, the best option is an old farm house that was owned by Elsa’s apparently crazy, abusive mother who never let her play with dolls, which is where the audience discovers that Elsa is a touch unstable and as Clive brilliantly exposits toward the end of the film just in case no one got it: “you did this for yourself!”

Sorry about that folks. Just a little bit of turbulence as we head toward the runway. Should be on the ground in just a few minutes.

Prior to Clive’s exclamation, Dren becomes a rather cognizant, and evidently attractive little multi-animal/human hybrid who develops a sexual attraction to Clive after witnessing her first primal scene of Elsa and Clive having sex – impossibly by the way—on the couch. (I don’t want to get into the impossibility of the sex scene right here, but when you watch the movie, you’ll be wondering how two people wearing jeans can have sex while the woman continues to wear jeans.) That aside, Dren’s attraction to Clive is illustrated to the audience through various drawing that she has done. Nothing is explicit, but she has only drawn Clive, which puts Elsa in a bit of a jealous rage. Here somehow, there is also a connection being drawn between Dren’s rejection of Elsa and Elsa’s rejection by her mother. While these could be parts of the same whole — or at least a fine model for the Electra Complex – it just seems a bit of a stretch, as does Elsa’s subsequent retaliation to amputate the end of Dren’s tail – the part with the claw-like stinger.

Well folks, welcome to Cleveland Hopkins International Airport. If this is your final destination, the luggage that hasn’t been lost will be located in Baggage Claim, Carousel C. For those of your traveling on, please enjoy wherever your final destination may be.

While not on board with the whole gestation of a full being issue to begin with, Clive feels ethically battered when he walks into the impromptu operation, hears Dren’s scrannel cry, and sees the houghs of her knees flexing against the leather restraints that fasten her to the table as Elsa removes the end of the tale. At this point, Elsa’s characters also reverts to that of a scientist, and her sole focus is on synthesizing the living proteins found within the recently amputated flesh.

So, how does one get back at a scientist girlfriend who seems to have lost all concern for another living being? By sleeping with the multi-animal/human hybrid.

Hi I’m Mary and I’m scared to death of flying…

And in both my airplane story and Splice, this is where I was praying for an explosion, an asteroid, a civilization-swallowing chasm, a bigger palm to plant my face in. First off, Clive has sex with the creature. He’s not attacked or raped. After a moment’s resistance, he kisses Dren and then becomes the dominant figure. Fine. She has wings that emerge when she’s all hot and bothered, and she’s cute…kind of – and available, but why?  What rationale could a screenwriter possible offer? They try. They really do. At one point, there’s a rather diaphanous excuse made when Clive states, “it’s your DNA [inside Dren] I can tell.” How?

Excuse me, Mr. Crick, could you please explain the superficially visible qualities of DNA?

The truth is, there is no practical reason for Clive to be the aggressor. Something interesting might have been if the screenwriters played on the whole “survival of a species angle.” It’s been done in Species, but at least it made a bit of sense, and in each scene, Sil was the aggressor. The men were just shills. Here, Clive becomes the aggressor, and there is no rationale.

To follow this up with more absurdity, Dren changes sex, so guess who she goes after. Yep. Prior to this, Clive’s nosy brother re-emerges to help them find her. How? Well, he has brought the movie’s symbol of uber-evil-capitalism, and justifies it before dying by saying “it’s the only way.” What is “it”? This is never explained, and the capitalist ultimately has nothing to do with capturing, killing, or selling Dren to a travelling circus. In fact, because they have no impact, the word “only” should also be stricken from the script, because clearly it is not.

I can only conclude by asserting that the unveiling at the end of Splice has all the charm of a burning Volkswagon stuffed to the brim with a dozen clowns.

DYL Mag Scale 7 (first half)

DYL Mag Scale 4 (second half)

{ 3 comments }

Because of its rather unique take on superhero origin stories, Iron Man was quite enjoyable and offered a glimpse at the birth of a superhero from his purely embryonic origins. The initial need for superpowers was unnecessary as Tony Stark is depicted as an enviable character prior to his iron baptism – an affluent playboy who drives fast, philanders without remorse with woman who are satisfied with the fact that he has had their wrinkled and stained dresses dry-cleaned overnight so that they can slip out just as easily and cleanly as they slipped in. Only a smile crosses their face as they are dismissed by the secretary.

In other words, Stark was established as an archetypical superhero inasmuch as his charm and bank account allowed him to accomplish and experience things that are idealized to the point of being unattainable by the average person. Then the film makes him mortal, letting the audience see how quickly one can perish if in the wrong place at the wrong time. Suddenly, money matters not, but Stark’s saving grace is his intellect and his determination to survive. Forced to rely on his innate talents, the superhero and the audience have bonded, and in much more of a way than one could bond with Peter Parker, the awkward teen who is bitten by a spider or Bruce Wayne who watches his parents brutally murdered in front of him, but has enough fiscal resources and an erudite butler to help him adjust.

Stark becomes the every man; his sense of survival transitions from sexual conquests and cars to self-reflection and the overall ramifications that his perpetually burgeoning capital has on society; the question of how he exists within himself and as a part of the world that his is charged with corrupting through the manufacturing of decimating weapons takes center stage. And, at the end of Iron Man, when Stark tosses aside the 3×5 cards that feed him a cover-up story to announce that he is Iron Man, there’s a sense that he does it because he can’t return to being a fraud, the face of a company with causes irreparable damage. Or, I would have liked to think…

Iron Man 2 confirms that my reading of the first film is a bit wonky, and instead of continuing Tony Stark’s changed-man personage, Iron Man 2 devolves Stark’s character back to the chauvinistic playboy. While this was charming in the initial film, Stark’s character was saved when he becomes reflective. There is little reflection in Iron Man 2; instead, Stark and Iron Man have become commodities; commodities that Stark himself is manufacturing and marketing, primarily when he arrives on the first day of Starkfest — the yearlong gathering of techno-junkies that will unveil the newest revolutionary weapons, gadgets, and gizmos to grace the world stage – dressed as Iron Man before stripping of the suit to make a speech about how he will not talk about how many times he has saved the world. As Stark’s humility flies out the window, so does our connection with him as Iron Man 2 actually illustrates him as more of a snarky ass than a guy we might empathize with.

Overall, this snarky persona has a binary effect on the audience. To writer Justin Theoux’s and director John Favreau’s credit, this snarky persona is actually closer to the one illustrated by the Iron Man comic books. Tony Stark was never really a likable guy in the comics and his struggle between being a model asshole mogul often conflicted with the inner responsibility to stop bad things from happening. At the same time, Stark’s snarkiness also pushes the audience to care less about what seems to be the primary plot of the film – aside from forging a bridge to the Avengers movie that will come out soon – the fact that Tony is dying from palladium, the “element that is keeping [him] alive,” which the HAL-like voice reminds us of in a rather unnecessarily expositing voiceover. (Tony presses his thumb to a small gadget to find out his “blood toxicity” reading three times within the first twenty minutes of the film.)

One would think that this recognition of mortality might bring Stark back to the character that charmed us in Iron Man; however, his mortality juxtaposed with the faux immortality of the Iron Man suit impels Tony to act recklessly, which in one sense could be seen as a cry for help. Unfortunately, this potential cry for help becomes a way to kill twenty-five minutes of film and elicit some cheap laughs – more from fist-palming than from genuine comedy.

Segue: There is no bigger face-palm in the movie than when Howard Stark, Tony’s father, talks to him from beyond the grave and reveals that the invention Howard is most of proud of is “you”.  This is not a spoiler; if you can sit through this film and not predict the word that’s coming after the pregnant pause, boo.

Depressed and struggling with his impending death, which HAL reminds us again “will kill [him],” Tony gets trashed during his birthday party, and our first glimpse of him is as a DJ, dressed in the Iron Man suit, slugging Dom Perignon. In a way, this is sad. Truthfully, not sure what I would do if I knew I was going to die sooner rather than later, but after Don Cheadle dons his own suit and orders the guests to leave, he and Tony proceed to destroy Tony’s house while fighting to Queen’s “Another One Bites the Dust,” which is a fine song, but prefaced by Stark requesting the late DJ AM to lay down a “beat.” In the end, the entire scene is an exercise in unnecessary footage.

Aside from relegating Stark to an annoying figure, which is actually a credit to Robert Downey Jr. who manages to make Stark simply annoying and not obnoxious, the film has some fine moments. The CGI is still rather stellar and the combat scenes involving Whiplash (Mickey Rourke), War Machine (Don Cheadle) and Iron Man are worth sticking around for, as is the preceding scene where chaos breaks loose at Starkfest. I promise, I’m not ruining anything. It’s a comic book movie. If you didn’t expect chaos, you’ve never read a comic book.  

Likewise, I was a bit hesitant about seeing Iron Man 2 because the previews were jammed with so many characters that it looked as if this would be the second coming of Joel Schumacher’s red-headedBatmanstepchildren, but surprisingly, the cast of characters don’t sink the film. Mickey Rourke’s performance is rather subdued, and while his character is important to the action that unfolds, it is also rather restrained and the revenge angle is not overly-complicated. Really, it serves to expose Stark as the snarky ass that he seems to be. 

In addition, Scarlett Johansson’s turn as Natalie Rushman/Natasha Romanov/Black Widow is also rather subdued, and the sequence where she takes out a dozen guards is quite well choreographed and not overly Matirx-y [sic?] And, Sam Rockwell, who is slowly becoming my number one for “Most Underrated Actor” does a fine job as the oblivious and thoroughly incompetent Justin Hammer.

In the end, the one thing that Iron Man 2 drove home for me was that Iron Man is not a very interesting character. He’s really just a man in an iron suit, and there was no need for a sequel aside for being a bridge to the upcoming “Avengers,” “Captain America,” and “Thor” – if you chose to stay around for three minutes beyond the credits – films.

DYL Mag Score: 6

{ 1 comment }

Typically, obesity, illiteracy, rape, child abuse, pedophilia, and incest that results in two children for a sixteen year old girl wouldn’t even warrant a viewing and would be automatically categorized as poverty-porn designed to hyperbolically inflict guilt on the white majority in a liberal-capitalist society—see Crash.

However, Precious conveys this glut of disturbing elements without diving into absurdity.  Precious is the heart-wrenching, yet delicate story of Claireece “Precious” Jones, an illiterate sixteen-year-old Harlem resident who has two children from multiple incestuous encounters with her father.

Much of the film is sublimated by the performances—particularly Mo’Nique, who plays Mary Jones, Precious’ mother who manipulates the welfare system so that she might continue to stagnantly inhabit her television-facing barcalounger without interruption while Precious (Gabourey Sidibe) fills the Cinderellaesque role of maid and caretaker to the rage-prone, iron-skillet wielding Mary.  Make no mistake, Mary is cruel and completely abhorrent, but unlike a number of similar characters, Mo’Nique does not portray her as a caricature pining for third-act vindication and audience love.  Instead, the third act closes, and the sympathy some may feel for Mary is outweighed by the churning cesspool that is her conscience.—which is what separates Precious from run-of-the mill poverty-porn.

I can’t assert that Precious contains no social message. There is clear, cutting commentary on the inadequacies of the education system that has allowed Precious to slip through the cracks for the better part of eleven years before expelling her for being pregnant with her second child.  That said, Precious addresses this issue tactfully.  In the sole public-school classroom scene, the teacher does not lose control a la Dangerous Minds, but it is apparent that the teacher is resigned to the presumed failure of his students, reciting, monotonous, rhetorical jargon—“homework is a requirement, not a request.”  While this might be catchy, it has no apparent influence over the students, and the teacher seems rather apathetic to their ambivalence.

Precious also avoids following paths trampled by Dangerous Minds and Freedom Writers in that it doesn’t invoke the good-natured, white-savior trope to rescue Precious from her seemingly insurmountable circumstances.  While Mrs. Lichtenstein, the guidance counselor, pulls Precious out of class and informs her about “Each One Teach One,” a program that provides reading and writing skills to at-risk youths, she shouldn’t be seen as a gracious savior.  Yes, she does something noble by encouraging Precious to choose “alternative education,” but Precious is in this situation because she had been ignored for most of her adolescence.  If nothing else, Mrs. Lichtenstein’s main priority is to sweep a pregnant teenager out of the public school system and alleviate themselves of the responsibility.

Cynical, yes, but it’s a cynical movie.

Through “Each One Teach One,” and a shoulder-clenching, neck cringing confrontation with Mary after the birth of Precious’ second child, Precious discovers potential purposes, desires and dreams that are not impelled by the aesthetically-driven television images that serve as an alternate reality for Precious—she often imagines herself as a character while being raped and abused—and Mary—a white-resenting woman who simultaneously tries to emulate the white aesthetic with her outfits, wig styles and makeup.

In a way, the use of television and media are reminiscent to James Baldwin’s Sonny’s Blues when the unnamed narrator observes “the two darknesses, the darkness of their lives, which was now closing in on them, and the darkness of the movies”—the perceived escape to an unattainable reality.

Perhaps the most compelling thing about Precious is that director Lee Daniels offers a glimpse at the life of an individual, not society in general.  And while society could be blamed for her situation, that seems too pedantic an interpretation.  If Daniels intended to comment on society as a whole, Precious would have found kindred spirits who suffer the same evil afflictions.  Although she finds camaraderie with her “Each One Teach One” classmates, we don’t know their backstories, and none of them look remotely like Precious; instead, they have their own intimated issues.

Refreshingly, Precious does not end with a dynamite-blast-crescendo that eradicates these sedimentary layers of abuses and deprecations; Precious remains damaged.  And while we have hope that she will pull herself away from her suffocating situation, Precious is not tied up in a neat little bow that preaches the power of positive thinking.  Rather, it offers hope for salvation that resides miles and miles away.

DYL MAG Score: 7.5

{ 0 comments }