Posts tagged as:

M. Night Shyamalan

In Revelations, Death will eventually enter on a pale horse followed by Hell, to whom “power was given […] over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth”; however, it seems the apocalypse is equally foretold when an unstoppable money-making force meets the harbinger of terrible movies and fodder for my most sardonically cynical posts.

A recent Time article has foretold this paradox that threatens to tear its way through Hollywood’s celluloid continuum when it announced that “Will Smith and son Jaden plan to star in a new M. Night Shyamalan-directed flick” (source).

An immediate – and accurate – reaction to this news is that only two possible solutions could present themselves here. First off, the Smith family’s journey into remaking all eighties movies will be heavily impeded and ultimately derailed when they team up with Shyamalan to remake Back to the Future, but this time, a twist is added in which George McFly (Crispin Glover) fails to knock out Biff, but instead of continuing to be Biff’s lackey, McFly wanders home with head hung low, and soon after, stumbles upon an article about serial killer Ed Gein, with whose sheltered and lonesome existence he finds compassion, driving George to lay low until he can accost Lorraine Baines (Lea Thompson) and Biff (Thomas F. Wilson) on their wedding day and proceed to hold Lorraine captive while he fashions Biff’s corpse into a Biff-suit so that he can play the role of “Daddy” as Marty McFly vanishes from existence while jamming to Huey Lewis is a cross-time split screen.

The more likely – and even perhaps more ominous – outcome of this endeavor is that Shyamalan’s career is resurrected, and he no longer inspires moviegoers to purge laughter at the brief flash of his name during a preview (source).  However frightening this prediction is, it seems rather probable, and mostly because Shyamalan – while still the director of the “futuristic sci-fi story set 1,000 years set in the future” (source) – seems unlikely to have any say about the content of the film, which is often the weakest part of his movies. Directorially, his past movies are entertaining, and even though his techniques sometimes border on pretention rather than necessity, his skill lies behind the camera.

But, this new project seems to have manufactured an antidote for his previous flops inasmuch as Jada Pinkett Smith, along with Will Smith are “co-producing the Shyamalan flick,” which suggests that anything not deemed Smith-worthy will not be filmed. And, this is where Shyamalan’s resurrection begins. While Will Smith has a few movies that I wish I had never seen, the majority have been entertaining, but more importantly for Shyamalan, only three movies since the release of Bad Boys in 1995 have grossed less than one-hundred million dollars (Ali, The Legend of Bagger Vance, and Seven Pounds), and most of them have grossed well over two-hundred million, even those that were critically questionable like I am Legend and Hancock (source).

The point here is that Smith is – even on a bad day – box-office gold, so if anything were to redeem the fatefully terrible movies of Shyamalan, with the lone exception being Unbreakable (the argument that The Sixth Sense is void because the movie is completely un-rewatchable and, honestly, the twist at the end is the only reason why people forget about how viscous the actual story is), it would be the presence of the Smith family, whose ability to churn out moneymakers is nearly preternatural.

You know, after this venture, we might want to prepare ourselves for a remake of Back to the Future.

{ 0 comments }

As a few million of you might know, Inception opened this past weekend to the delight of many and the derision of a few who expected a summer movie to be a masterpiece. Please note: there is no “second coming” in the summer. If you’re privy to the recent heat wave that has blanketed the Northeast, summer movies are prime excuses to pay someone else to run their air conditioner for a few hours. Thus, my unfortunate viewing of Ang Lee’s Hulk in 2003.

I believe it was a Thursday in the month of June – one in Jaimaca Estates where the faux-mercury of thermometers broached the ninety-five degree strata, fermenting the airborne smell of curry so that I might never eat samosa again without tasting bile in the back of my throat, and boiling the sidewalks of Highland Avenue to such an extent that the crack-dealing ice-cream-truck drivers began stealing Icee Pops from the local bodega to sell them to children and sweltering junkies looking for a raspberry fix.

Clearly, I digress, and more on the awesome entertainment value of Inception will be tackled in a later post, but for the time being, here’s a brief look at the theatrical experience leading up to the feature presentation.

After arriving forty five minutes before the showing, I realized I should have arrived an hour prior once I saw the four-line queue that occupied the area in front of Union Square’s Theater 4 and the adjacent theaters. Deciding that sitting in the front row of a movie theater might be one of the biggest wastes of thirteen dollars I could come up with – aside from last week’s decision to sit in the center of the theater and watch the incomprehensibly lame and unoriginal Predators – I trekked to Theater 4’s balcony and found a much shorter line.

6:45 arrives and my line crawls forward; burgundy clad, flash-light toting ushers make sure the queue remains one and no one decides to bum rush the theater door. Stragglers who sent shills to hold their places emerge from the auction house of a concession counter, fully equipped with hydrogenated popcorn swimming in yellowish-dyed oleo byproduct that tastes faintly like butter with an intriguing petrol bouquet.

Content with rather solid seats, those in the balcony occasionally approach the railing to the main house of Theater 4 and wait for carnage to ensue. Nothing really happens, though when the doors below open, viewers flood in like pigeons spotting an old woman with a bag of Wonder Bread in tow, bodies bumping into each other, respective heads bobbing forward and back, looking left, right, ahead and behind as not to overlook any seats they pass that will accommodate their six companions who are using the bathrooms or finishing a final pint at the corner bar. As soon as one person sits, he or she immediately begins pulling items from bags, strewing clothing, water bottles, baseball caps, and shoes, to save seats and create a perfect illustration of a Buzby Berkley bacchanal.

The echoing “are these seats taken?” wanes, the lights dim, and the previews begin. Two film trailers with Zack Galifianakas are shown – Dinner With Schmucks and Due Date – both of which could be pretty funny. The first includes Paul Rudd and Steve Carell while the other co-stars Robert Downey Jr. The only downside to these two films is that Galifianakas may soon fall prey to the overuse of an actor and become a caricature of himself. The Hangover 2 is also coming out, and he may be forever enshrined as Alan.

These two previews generated a fair amount of laughter from the audience, but fascinatingly enough, the biggest laugh came during the next trailer – one for a horror-flick set in an elevator, Devil. Admittedly, I was drawn into the original premise – though it seems the filmmakers have shown their hand already inasmuch as they establish two certain red herrings in the first fifteen seconds of the trailer, one being a bearded, hoodie-under-a-corduroy jacket-wearing guy who thrusts his arm through the closing doors of the elevator so that he might not miss it and have to wait another thirty seconds for the next one. Anyone who is clearly portrayed as being the least professional of the characters shouldn’t be so frantic about catching a lift, unless of course he is the demon incarnate. That said, the filmmakers also show a sweet red-haired older woman, but making her the Devil just seems a bit too derivative, and truthfully – if that’s the way they are going – they should have gotten Betty White. She’s so hot right now.

At the same time, the movie looks pretty suspenseful and creepy – kind of like Quarantine – and if the filmmakers didn’t cross the eighty-five-minute mark, they should be able to keep the audience enthralled for the better part of the “which one of these people is the Devil?” deduction.

However, despite its promising start, this movie was doomed by the end of the trailer. Crimson text on a background denotes “One of these five people is not who they appear to be” … “From Universal Pictures” … “Comes a new nightmare,” but then… Well, then all suspense is obviated and the air is sucked from the theater and into the lungs of each and every viewer so that they might in unison release a rogue wave of laughter that overtakes the suddenly heavy laden score replete with metal clanging that portends to mimic the vibration of steel elevator cables that threaten to snap at any moment, providing white-knuckle entertainment.

But this potential is neglected. The suspense will never happen because the audience has read the no-longer ominous crimson text, but the vapid Crayola-red of “From the Mind of M. Night. Shyamalan,” words that augur horror shtick and the misremembered nostalgia of The Sixth Sense, a movie only watchable once for the – admittedly – surprising twist, but what many people seem to forget is that the pacing of the 1999 film is so viscous that the twist simply jars you from your slumber and makes you wonder what you missed.

Perhaps it was the scene in which Malcolm Crowe (Bruce Willis) is present in the same room as Lynn Sear (Toni Collette) so you believe they had to have had a conversation, or perhaps it was … well, that was it.

I can admire Mr. Shyamalan’s tenacity here, and quite frankly, it takes a lot of guts to keep making movies that people apparently dislike five eighths of – which perhaps makes him a true artist – but crediting a story’s conception in the “mind” of a man who has consistently provided predictable and rather mediocre story lines shouldn’t be a selling point. Honestly, I’m almost betting on the old woman to be the Devil. Or, it could be the young woman who is attacked first because … well, just seems like something that would be too farcical and misdirecting to really be considered.

{ 6 comments }

This graphical breakdown of career director arcs over on Into the Abyss is pretty damn fantastic. What author Todd Miro did was compile all the Rotten Tomatoes scores for all the movies made by a director and then chart those critical rankings on a line graph to show how well each director’s flicks were received over time.

Pretty simple

Head over to his original post to see the graphs for Scorsese, the Cohen Brothers, Tarantino, David Fincher, Ridley Scott, William Friedkin and the Wachowski Brothers. All are muy neato.

But the three that were the most interesting to me were the three most extreme charts: M. Night Shyamalan (the initial subject of the discussion), Stanley Kubrick and Francis Ford Coppola. Honestly, it pains me to even write those three names in the same sentence, but it makes for a nice comparison when you compare M. Night’s 1929-stock-market-looking graph next to Kubrick’s unassailable career of acclaim next to Coppola’s inconsistency.

Ultimately, however, even though Coppola has made some hot garbage in his day, he will likely always remain in my top five of all time just on the strength of there being no more impressive four-movie run in cinematic history than The Godfather, The Conversation (which I honestly don’t even really like), The Godfather II and Apocalyspe Now. There might be three of the best ten films ever in there. Just unreal.

Along similar lines, good luck to any actor who ever wants to have a cleaner, more perfect IMDB page than John Cazale. Nice resume, buddy.

{ 0 comments }