Posts tagged as:

Academy Awards

I heard there was an Oscar broadcast last night, but when looking back on the evening, it seemed that there was less of an awards show and more of an attempt to draw in a younger, hipper audience to the annual event, which was mocked at least three times in the first half –hour by hosts Anne Hathaway and James Franco, who welcomed us to the “younger, hipper” Academy Awards.

And, maybe this was the shtick the Academy was going for, playing off of the snarkiness and sarcastic tone of the younger generation, but the train wreck begins when the snarkiness is scripted, rendering this awards show like many others: predictable in awards and gimmicks, resulting in more boredom than entertainment.

Predictability in Awards hardly bothers me now unless the show runs over four hours. As Anthony Lane has suggested, “people who seriously expect movies to be original should find themselves another art form,” and he has a fine point here. Many of the movies we are surrounded by are derivative, and the challenge is to convey the content in some variation of a variation of a variation. In the same vein, the Academy Awards is a rat looking for a food pellet in a maze while avoiding being zapped by a phony feeder bar.

The pellet for all of these shows is ratings: do people tune in? If so, they are satiated, and despite some of the terrible shows in recent memory, people keep watching. Despite the running times that fluctuate from 180 minutes to 269 minutes, people keep watching. In a sense, it can be likened to NASCAR: there’s a high percentage of a wreck, but if not, the finish could be close.

Who could turn away last night while watching the uncomfortable juxtaposition of Hathaway’s over-exuberance with Franco’s uncomfortable – and seemingly unprepared – dopey-straight man performance. Perhaps they were both just performing and went a tad overboard; on the other hand, Hathaway is an actress who took a role in Havoc, one in which she stripped naked a handful of times, just to shatter the Disney image procured through The Princess Diaries. She wants to belong, and she wants to stand on that stage with her very own Oscar, so perhaps her quandary of when nakedness stopped equaling a nomination is more truthful than tongue-in-cheek, though it certainly came off as scripted.

And perhaps Franco, who has been magnificent in a number of films including this year’s 127 Hours and Howl, wasn’t acting so much as showing how indifferent most of us are to who hosts the Oscars. What more could you expect from a guy who spends his days on General Hospital, his nights on a full course load at Yale, and the rest of his time rumored to be producing adaptations of McCarthy’s Blood Meridian and Faulkner’s As I Lay Dying? The Academy might have been driven to use Franco because of his current hot streak in Hollywood, but what else could they have expected?

It seems evident that they expected little more from their hosts than to move the show along, particularly in the decision to put Hathaway in a tux to slander Hugh Jackman (Why did he get so much flack last night?), which leads to the predictable emergence of Franco in a dress. Cross dressing can be funny, but please see my previous post about why this was not. The same can be said for Kirk Douglas announcing the Best Supporting Actress Award. Kirk Douglas deserves the respect any storied actor does, but that segment might have been the most uncomfortable scene in recent memory – ranking right up there with the last few Rocking New Years Eves where Dick Clark delivers the coda through the side of his mouth. It’s noble to think “once a performer, always a performer,” but both inclusions border on embarrassment and humiliation – kind of like asking Muhammad Ali to announce “Let’s get ready to rumble!”

It is wonderful that Douglas is still mentally sharp and has a sense of humor – one of the funnier parts of the broadcast was certainly his recurrent pregnant pauses before Melissa Leo became catatonic and then tourretic on stage – but most of his appearance was scripted, which is evident when the suited stage hand took his cane and held it on the bottom — an awkwardly shot moment because no one would hold a cane as such – which prompted Douglas to enter into a hand-over-hand competition to see who wins the cane.

In the end, the Academy favorite won the award for Best Picture, Firth took last year’s Best Actor award home this year, Christopher Nolan remained shut out, as did David Fincher who – if not Aronofsky – deserved the Best Director Award. Therefore, regardless of who hosts the Oscars, the predictability is constant, and perhaps instead of moving to a younger, hipper audience, the Academy is going for the indifferent kind.

{ 0 comments }

A writer for a movie site should probably relish watching the Academy Award nominations and prepare for the witty banter that comes from surprise winners and loveable losers who just can’t seem to take the ten-pound, gilded man home; however, for the last few years, disillusion has outweighed the entertainment value of the awards, and awards seem based more on pay backs and life time achievements than on merit. For an example, you can take a look at this year’s Best Actor race and try to explain how Jeff Bridges took home an Oscar for a mediocre movie with a decent performance, but nothing profound like Colin Firth in A Single Man. The strangeness here lies where Bridges would probably win this year for True Grit if Firth weren’t going to make up last year’s snub with The King’s Speech. Is it all a one-hundred percent sham? No, but Oscar pools are often won by picking the person who will win, not who should win. That said, for the past few years – much like the equally meaningless BCS National Championship Game I root for chaos, and this year, it might just happen if Banksy wins an Oscar for Best Director of a Documentary for Exit Through the Gift Shop.

For starters, the movie is great, and it takes a look at how we define art, whether it’s worth is monetarily-based or whether its value stems from social impact or generational longevity.

Most of all, the contradiction within Banksy winning is the best part of this potential chaos. First of all, he is notoriously reclusive and protective of his identity, so there’s no way he will appear on stage to collect his Oscar in any way that would jeopardize this. That said, there are rumors that he will don a monkey mask should he win. If so, I would bet it would be the first time anyone has accepted a statue while impersonating a primate. But more importantly, he would justify the validity and the theme of Exit Through the Gift Shop by negating the importance placed on aesthetic-related fame and emphasizing the value of the message within a piece of art. If Banksy remains anonymous, the film must stand on its own and the thematic content therein garners more praise than his papparazi-blitzed visage.

Now, one could suggest that a monkey-mask stunt will further glamorize the mystery that is Bansky, and I can’t say that this is completely incorrect, though Banksy the person still remains a mystery and his art will have to be the lone, unadulterated version we get of him, forcing us to look for the social commentary rather than poking and prodding into his personal life. In other words, he remains an enigma, further positioning himself away from Thierry Gueta, “the guy who tried to make a documentary about [Banksy], but he was more interesting” in that he followed a number of “subversive graffiti artists,” those who work under the cover of night and occlude their identities by forcing the public to view the artwork rather than the person behind it. The person remains a specter, so the recurrent image generates and then maintains its power with every emergence on a brick wall, scaffolding, or highway overpass.

This method is antithetical by Guetta, who became an artist by parodying art that had already been parodied by Any Warhol and others. Does this make him less of an artist? I have no idea, but Guetta’s selling a million dollars of artwork thrusts him onto the street art scene despite the way in which he differs from other street artists like Banksy and Shepard Fairey, integral cogs in the birth of “an explosive new movement that would become known as street art – a hybrid form of graffiti driven by a new generation.”

“The biggest counterculture movement since punk,” street art takes advantage or repetition and breaks the monotony of cityscapes. In addition, the monotony interrupting images catch the eyes of passersby and beg them to take photographs and capture them on the newest digital recording devices. Therefore, temporariness of street art – primarily because unsanctioned art is labeled graffiti and is often covered by city officials and beautification programs – gains permanence, allowing it to its way onto the internet, epidemically spreading throughout cyberspace.

What differs between Guetta and other street artists is that he is more obsessed with his own celebrity, more focused on giving interviews and delegating incomprehensible and at times incoherent instructions to artists who have volunteered to help him set up a gallery showing, though he is often called “retarded” and will not draw these same volunteers to his next opening. Guetta is also more focused on mimicking other street artists than he is with creating his traditional art, and maybe this is what Exit is getting at: the birth of an artist caught up in the hype of being an artist, not one trying to make a social or political statement.

The contradiction between celebrity artists and social artists would also be a fine catalyst of chaos to inject into the Academy Awards, namely because the Oscars are often used to springboard stars into the spotlight or capitalize on “It” status, revolving around beauty on the red carpet, hookups at the after parties and celebrity gossip that threatens the inclusion of roasting monologues, but often lobs tepid verbal Koosh balls about the number of kids adopted by the Pitt-Jolies or how many women Jack Nicholson slept with thirty years ago.

In the end, handing this award over to an artist who rails against many of the Hollywood-based artists and the celebrity obsessed might be the most interesting occurrence at the Oscars since Brando hired a woman to dress like a Native American and refuse his Oscar. However, this year the Academy might just give Banksy the award in hopes of drawing extra viewers. Thus is the paradox of Hollywood. Some are famous for talent; some for being famous; some for rejecting fame; but with receipt of that little gilded man, all become property of the Academy.

However, the entire film could be another elaborate Banksy hoax: source

{ 2 comments }

And the Nominees are…

by Robert Cotto on January 25, 2011 · 2 comments

The Coen Brothers' remake of "True Grit" lands 10 Oscar Nominations

For a complete list of nominees, please click here.

The Oscar nominations are in, and while “The King’s Speech” is leading the way with twelve nominations, I’m very surprised at all the love “True Grit” received this morning, in second place with ten nominations, after being snubbed by the Golden Globes and The Directors Guild of America.

The gauntlet of Public Relations worked well for some of these surprise nominees, who eased out, what seemed to be, surefire nominees.

Julia Roberts hosted a screening of “Biutiful” last month in Los Angeles, praising her “Eat, Pray, Love” co-star Javier Bardem. Since the Academy’s voting majority is actors, actors campaigning for each other seems to work. Bardem eased out potential nominees Robert Duvall for “Get Low” (who was the front runner for most of the year to win his 2nd Best Actor Oscar) and Ryan Gosling for the controversial “Blue Valentine”, in which the films NC-17 publicity tirade scared too many voters off in acknowledging it more. Though Michelle Williams’ performance got recognized, the movie is nothing without Gosling.

With exception of Natalie Portman, the rest of the “Black Swan” ensemble got shut out. One of the surprises I was hoping for this morning was for Barbara Hershey to land a Supporting Actress nod for her Piper Laurie-esque “Carrie” performance. Ah, well.

The Best Actress race will be a show down between three-time nominee Annette Bening and Natalie Portman’s tour de force. Oscar pundits say Portman has it won already. But, I can’t seem to wrap my head around that, considering Bening is consistently turning out good work, this being among her best. She always seems to be in contention, whether she gets nominated of not. Oh, and she’s married to Warren Beatty. What does Bening’s spouse have anything to do with this? The Roberts/Bardem logic applies here, as well. Bottom line though, it’s the work. The work is so good, it got Julianne Moore snubbed…again.

The biggest surprise of the morning for me was the nomination for John Hawkes in “Winter’s Bone”, who, for me, was the best thing about the movie. It was at that moment I was expecting “Winter’s Bone” to do well. It was sure to, and did, wind up in one of the ten spots. Jennifer Lawrence’s star-making turn got acknowledged, as did the screenplay. The most common reaction from this group of filmmakers is sure to be, “It’s great just to be nominated.”

Even though many would say the surprise in the Director category is Joel and Ethan Coen securing a nomination, it’s really David O. Russell besting Christopher Nolan. While “The Fighter” is a well-done work, it’s the performances that drive the movie, not his directing. The resolution of the film seems more like a conclusion rather than a victory. It surely doesn’t have the power that “Rocky” continues to have 35 years later. Even though Rocky loses to Apollo, at the end of that flick, Rocky still won. “Inception” is a film driven by it’s director, not it’s performances. As stated here before, Nolan is the star of “Inception”. Failing to recognize him is disappointing. Nolan did wind up in the “Citizen Kane/Pulp Fiction” consolation prize category, Best Original Screenplay.

With all the love “True Grit” received this morning, don’t be surprised if Hailee Steinfeld pulls a Tatum O’Neal and wins Best Supporting Actress for “True Grit”. You heard it here first.

The Academy Awards air on February 27, 2011 on ABC. More predictions coming soon.

{ 2 comments }

The 82nd Academy Awards are tonight, and the best, brightest and beautiful of Hollywood will gather yet again to honor the year that was in cinema. Below are my predictions for who will win the hardware tonight.

Fill out your Oscar pools carefully. (And as a reminder, here is a full list of the nominees in all the major categories.)

Best PictureThe Hurt Locker

Best Director – Kathryn Bigelow, The Hurt Locker

Best Actor – Jeff Bridges, Crazy Heart

Best Actress – Gabourey Sidibe, Precious (IF THERE WILL BE A SURPRISE ON OSCAR NIGHT THIS WILL BE IT. If all goes to predictabilty, congratulations, Sandra Bullock.)

Best Supporting Actor – Christoph Waltz, Inglourious Basterds

Best Supporting Actress – Mo’Nique, Precious

Best Original ScreenplayInglourious Basterds, Quentin Tarantino

Best Adapted ScreenplayUp in the Air, Jason Reitman

Animated FeatureUp

Art DirectionAvatar

CinematographyAvatar

Costume DesignThe Young Victoria

Documentary FeatureThe Cove

Film EditingAvatar

Foreign Language FilmThe White Ribbon

MakeupThe Young Victoria

Original ScoreUp

Original Song – “The Weary Kind,” Crazy Heart

Sound EditingThe Hurt Locker

Sound Mixing The Hurt Locker

Visual EffectsAvatar

(Disclaimer: I have no clue whatsoever on these final three.)

Documentary Short The Last Truck: Closing of a GM Plant

Animated ShortA Matter of Loaf and Death

Live Action Short The New Tenants

{ 0 comments }